Comprehensive Framework: Should Modern Day Christians Keep the 7th Day Sabbath or Was It Done Away With at the Cross?
The Debate: Positions Presented
Apostle T.F. Chiwenga's Position (Against Sabbath Observance for Christians):
- The Sabbath was exclusively for Israel - Given as part of the Mosaic covenant at Sinai, not a universal requirement
- Gentiles were never commanded to observe the Sabbath - The law was given specifically to the children of Israel, not to all humanity
- No New Testament believers observed the Sabbath - Paul entering synagogues on the Sabbath was for evangelism, not worship observance
- Christ ended the law - Romans 10:4 states "Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone that believes"
- The law was abolished at the cross - Including the Ten Commandments (2 Corinthians 3:7-13, Colossians 2:14)
- We worship God every day - Not bound to Saturday or Sunday; worship is in spirit and truth
- Salvation is through Christ alone - Not through law observance or Sabbath keeping
Evangelist Marufu's Position (For Sabbath Observance):
- The Sabbath was established at Creation - Genesis 2:2-3, before sin, making it perpetual
- It's part of the Ten Commandments - Which are moral law, not ceremonial law that was abolished
- Jesus kept the Sabbath - Luke 4:16, and said "the Sabbath was made for man" (Mark 2:27)
- Apostles observed the Sabbath - Multiple references to Paul and others on the Sabbath (Acts 13:42-44, Acts 16:13)
- It remains in prophecy - Revelation speaks of God's people keeping His commandments (Revelation 12:17, 14:12)
- Sunday was a Catholic change - Not biblical; the change from Saturday to Sunday was made by the Catholic Church
- The Sabbath identifies God as Creator - Essential for remembering and honoring God
Common Ground: Both men agreed on salvation by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, but disagreed fundamentally on whether Sabbath observance is required for Christians today.
Introduction
To properly address whether modern-day Christians should observe the seventh-day Sabbath, we must first establish the fundamental framework of Christianity itself, which is grounded in salvation from sin through Jesus Christ. This requires us to define sin, which, according to Scripture, originated in the disobedience of Adam and Eve. Their transgression implies the prior existence of a divine law to which humanity was meant to be subject. It also introduced the promise of a Messiah who would come to bear the penalty of sin on behalf of humanity. Scripture clearly teaches that the penalty for sin is death—"For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord" (Romans 6:23)—a penalty that Christ Himself bore on humanity's behalf. At this point, a critical question emerges: would such a substitutionary sacrifice have been necessary if the divine law itself had been set aside?
From this starting point, we must then consider whether the salvation accomplished by Christ removes the obligation to keep the very law that was broken, which gave rise to the need for redemption in the first place. Within this framework, the question naturally extends to the Sabbath commandment. If Christ's atonement abolishes the law, then the Sabbath is rendered unnecessary. However, if Christ's work affirms the permanence of the law and restores humanity's relationship to God, then the Sabbath retains its relevance for Christians today.
Having established this foundational context, we must next turn to a series of biblical tests. These will allow us to evaluate whether Scripture itself supports the continued observance of the seventh-day Sabbath, or whether it affirms its abrogation at the cross.
Chronological Tests to Establish the Biblical Framework
⚖️ Important Note for Our Readers
Below you will find our comprehensive legal tests where we apply legal precision frameworks to examine this doctrinal debate. Each test title is clickable and will take you to a detailed analysis page where we apply rigorous legal methodology to examine specific biblical and theological questions. Simply click on any test that shows "Click to Explore" to access the full legal examination and evidence analysis. Tests marked as "Coming Soon" are currently undergoing our thorough legal review process and will be available shortly.
Critical Distinctions to Establish
1. Moral Law vs. Ceremonial Law
- Origin (God-spoken vs. Moses-written)
- Medium (stone vs. parchment)
- Location (in the ark vs. beside the ark)
- Duration (eternal vs. until Christ)
- Purpose (character of God vs. shadows of Christ)
2. Types of "Commandments" in Scripture
- Adamic commands (pre-fall and post-fall)
- Noahic commands
- Abrahamic commands
- Mosaic commands (moral and ceremonial)
- Christ's commands
- Apostolic commands
- Which "commandments" are referenced in Revelation?
3. Understanding Prophetic Language
- When is prophetic language literal vs. symbolic?
- How do we interpret time references in prophecy?
- What is apocalyptic language convention?
Conclusion of Framework
Only after establishing:
- Which law existed from creation
- The distinction between moral and ceremonial law
- How sin affects all humanity universally
- What Christ accomplished regarding each type of law
- Who is under which covenant
- What law applies in the new covenant
- What identifies God's end-time people
- What continues into eternity
Can we then properly address whether the Sabbath specifically:
- Was a creation ordinance or Mosaic institution
- Is part of moral or ceremonial law
- Applies to Gentile Christians
- Is necessary for salvation
- Identifies God's end-time remnant
- Will continue in the new creation
This systematic approach ensures we're not isolating the Sabbath question from the broader biblical narrative of law, sin, redemption, and final restoration.